"SNOOPING SCANDAL,MODI AND PROJECT PRISM"

Dear Indian Citizen,

The recent Snooping Scandal alleged in regime of Shri Narendra Modi has woken up entire media,ruling party and opposition on the ISSUE OF PRIVACY RIGHTS OF INDIAN CITIZEN AND DUTY OF THE STATE.The snooping incident is summarized as below.

Chief Minister of Gujarat was orally requested by an elderly person to have surveillance on his major daughter .The CM provided with the necessary arrangements (whether through written orders or oral communications is not established yet.) in response to the request.This incident dates back to 2009,i.e.4 years ago.

Now The ruling party Congress got hold of this information through COBRAPOST sting operation and CONGRESS is very furious about INVASION OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF INDIAN CITIZEN.They contain that Gujarat CM has has invaded PRIVACY OF INDIAN CITIZEN BY ORDERING TAPPING OF HER COMMUNICATIONS WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT.

Portals Cobrapost and Gulail released a report and made public tapes in which Shah, a close aide of Modi, is purportedly heard directing the state police to monitor the movements of a young woman and a senior IAS officer. The websites alleged three key wings of the Gujarat police were involved in this snooping effort.

 “Can he violate the law by snooping upon every conversation of the girl? Can the chief minister be allowed to use the entire state resources to snoop and invade the privacy of one young woman even if her father made that request? “Under what provision of the law was the Indian Telegraph Act violated? Who should be punished for these violations?” ARE THE QUESTIONS RAISED BY RULING CONGRESS PARTY.

 Now compare this activity with PROJECT PRISM.

We know that through PROJECT PRISM National Security Agency of USA uses to gain access to the private communications of users of nine popular Internet services. The access is governed by Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was enacted in 2008. A classified PowerPoint presentation leaked by Edward Snowden states that PRISM enables "collection directly from the servers" of Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook and other online companies.

This means that practically all the conversation,communications, file sharing, photo sharing etc. through ONLINE medium was,is and will be accessed by USA.

The bigger issue here is USA is invading PRIVACY OF NETIZEN of entire Universe and nobody has even raised a voice of concern EITHER FROM CONGRESS OR BJP?

Does this act of USA is not violation of INDIAN CONSTITUTION as per arguments of Congress Leaders? Are FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OR FOR THAT MATTER HUMAN RIGHTS are not violated by USA?

ARE WE AS A NATION CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAME?

It is very sorry state of affairs that NEITHER MEDIA NOR RULING PARTY NOR MAIN OPPOSITION PARTY is VOCAL on this issue and all of them CONCERNED ABOUT PRIVACY INVASION OF AN INDIVIDUAL.

The way news channels are debating this issue and amount of time devoted to this issue as compared to PROJECT PRISM ISSUE, only makes one understand that in this COUNTRY POLITICS IS ALWAYS FIRST,POLITICIANS ARE ALWAYS THE PRIORITY FOR TRP.

National Interest issues are neither PRIORITY of POLITICIANS NOR MEDIA.

I hope that at least this snooping incident will remind the people once again about PROJECT PRISM and make them more vocal.

CYBER CRIME HELPLINE

Cyber Crimes are growing at rapid pace and internet savvy people are falling prey to various criminal activities recently. There is immediate need to awake and aware these innocent people and provide them necessary guidance to protect themselves as well as critical infrastructures, which they are accessing on regular basis. There is also growing threat to Sensitive Personal Data of all the users.

 TO GUIDE VICTIMS OF CYBER CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE THEM REMEDIAL ADVICE ,CYBER AWARENESS ORGANISATION has launched CYBER CRIME HELPLINE on +919225109900.

Any person can dial this number and avail remedial advice from following consultants.


1) Advocate Mahendra Limaye CYBER LEGAL CONSULTANT Nagpur
2) MrRakshit Tandon Cyber Security Professional Agra UP
3) Mr.N Vijayshanker Information Assurance Consultant Banglore
4) Mr.S.P.Shrivastava Retd. D G UP POLICE.
5) Mr.Kartikeya Paneri Cyber Legal Professional Ahmebadabad
6) Mr.Sunil Shrivastava Cyber Forensic Professional Delhi
7) Mr.Rahul Jamgade Computer Security Consultant Banglore
8) Mr.Rajat Agrawal Info sec consulant Jaipur
9) Mrs.Utpal Mehta Consultant Vadodara
11) Adv.Tarun Kanjolia Chandigarh
12) Adv.Gurpreet Singh Monga Delhi

For more queries please call on 09422109619

AN APPEAL TO I T PROFESSIONALS BASED IN US.

“HEMA”, Uncle Sam is watching you article in TOI dated 10/8 2013 affirms views that after Edward Snowden incident, Uncle Sam will be more cautious in its approach and all the employees working for Project Prism will be under scanner. Defense Information System Agency (DISA) will work for “Insider Threat” Program developed by President Obama administration in order to prevent further embarrassment to US .This program has identified certain Threat Indicators which may include your political views, frequency of travel to your native country, your financial position etc.

The reason for this Insider Threat Program may be justified by US on backdrop of Snowden incident but how much success it will yield? Does this program provide a warning for non-US nationals associated with PROJECT PRISM? How many people really know that they are working for this MASS SURVELLIANCE PROGRAM? Can the US act of keeping track of all the electronic correspondence be justified by any Sovereign country?

There are various questions which need answers and I find it strange that all the intellectuals across the India are keeping mum on these serious issues. Rather than debating the possible outcome of this Insider Threat program, we are giving US a clean cheat in this whole Surveillance program by terming as Educative Program.

I foresee following fall outs of this Insider Threat Program.

1)      The nationals other than US nationals will be subject to unnecessary inconvenience in all the walks of life.

2)      Their all activities will be under scanner.

3)      There conversations/communications will be under surveillance.

4)      Their trips to native country might be curtailed and will be subject to approval from Defense Ministry.

5)      They will be compelled to quit on smallest lapse or error in their job responsibility.

In other words all the I T Professionals working in US will be looked upon by suspicion and there life will be nightmarish in future.

This is time for all I T Professionals working in US to have a courage and come back to India in order to make India a strong I T Force in future.

National Crimes Record Bureau 2013 – 60% (reported) growth in CYBER CRIMES.

National Crimes Record Bureau has recently published its report for year 2012.The reports in its chapter 18 regarding CYBER CRIMES has revealed some interesting facts. I have made an effort to analyse the same. The analysis is as below. 
1)      The overall growth in Cyber Crimes in India is 60% as compared to 2012. (This is only reported figure and hence the unreported cyber crimes which are very large in number does not find place in this data.) 
2)      Chhattisgarh has shown most phenomenon growth of 2350% and Kerala the most literate state has shown 18% growth in cyber crimes reporting. (In case of Chhattisgarh the fact may be police are better trained and hence booked crimes under proper sections of I T, which might not have happened previous year.)  
3)      Surprisingly Karnataka, the I T Hub of India has seen growth of 172% and the Financial Capital housing Maharashtra has shown 53% growth in reporting of Cyber Crimes.(Maybe the I T Hub provides more opportunities for cyber criminals.) 
4)      West Bengal with 355%, UP with 103% are other centurion states. 
5)      City wise Kolkata has outperformed all by 1033% growth, followed by Surat 700%, Agra 340%, Mumbai 312% and my Nagpur has witnessed 118% growth in reporting of Cyber Crimes.(The growth in reporting of cyber crimes is encouraging as it makes police and netizens more vigilant. The other reason might be due to increased CYBER AWARENESS Campaigns appealing netizens to come forward and report the complaints so that crimes might be investigated.) 
6)      The arrest statistics is really worrying as it confirms involvement of maximum youths in Cyber crimes.61% are between age group of 18-30 and 28% between age group of 30-45.(This is cause of concern since India will by youngest Democracy by 2020 and by then its maximum netizens would be under threat from fellow netizens. The maximum efforts need to be concentrated on training netizens to make ethical uses of Internet and related applications.) 
7)      The other worrying element is ever after its inception in year 2000 and further amendments in year 2008 Information Technology Act has not gone well with law enforcement agencies which still tend to book cyber crimes under IPC provisions.( These IPC provisions are not fully capable of covering all aspects of Cyber Crimes. ) 
8)      The most surprising thing is that even NCRB seems to be unaware about I T Act amendmentsAnd has mentioned only sections 65/66/67.( After amendments in 2008 I T Act has sections 65,66,66A,B,C,D,E,F AND 67A,B,C but neither our police authorities have updated knowledge nor our highest agency officials i.e. NCRB has shown concern to change the old profarma  wherein provisions of old I T Act sections 65.66 and 67 are available.  

In such situation what will be fate of victim? 
Advocate Mahendra Limaye

An open letter to Mr.Salman Khurshid,Foreign Minister Goevrnment of India

Dear Sir,

Greetings of the day!!!!

As a law abiding citizen and person with little knowledge about law I am very much disturbed about your recent comments about PROJECT PRISM being carried out by USA and exposed by Edward Snowden,

              You  played down reports of US snooping on diplomatic missions, including Indian embassy in Washington, saying the "intrusion" was only a computer study of patterns that is not a serious concern.                                Sir,if the activity of intrusion can be termed as an academic interest activity then hats off to you since US has declared the academician(?) as enemy number one and tracing him across the globe, with every available resource.The activity of SNOOPING has raised several issues including definition of sovereignty of states and what are duties and responsibilities of state?Are our states unable to guarantee DATA PRIVACY? If yes then they should warn the citizens regarding Privacy intrusion while using these mediums and stop all e-governance projects immediately.  Is Big Brother free to snoop on each and every activity which is being carried out through Electronic communications?What are functions of State if they are not able to defend Privacy of its Citizen on its own soil?   Are we suppose to believe on US presidents statements that this SNOOPING activity is only to curtail terrorist activities and may I ask what cautious warnings were passed by US about cross border activities by our beloved neighbor Pakistan?  Are we to believe that what US thinks is right and other nations don't have any say on this?                                                                                                                                                                                                 Sir in my view all of us have underestimated the devastating destruction value this PROJECT PRISM.Just imagine a situation wherein an Indian company is competing with US based company.Is their any possibility of unfair play using these so called study?Can we summarily ruled out the role played by US through control over social media in dethroning regimes in Middle east? There are several issues but the need of hour is to be cautious in our comments and accept the facts.The fact is US is doing no charity or academic activity through PROJECT PRISM and there are bigger motives behind such activities.President Obama has openly defended the spying activities and we are terming those as academic activities. I hope good sense will prevail and this letter,if read fully,may initiate some brain storming.                                                                                                                                                                                                          Thanks                                                                                                                                                         Advocate Mahendra Limaye